|
Post by zarog on May 27, 2011 10:13:04 GMT -5
I would just like to take the time to remind everyone that once we have an elected WA Delegate, it would be best if all WA members would endorse them. The only reason for this is to ensure our region's security. We have been raided, so it's just best to have a lot of endorsements. Thank you.
|
|
|
Post by zarog on Jun 5, 2011 23:23:02 GMT -5
This has become a near moot point for maintenance of the region following recent events; however, maybe we should start polling for WA Delegate status. Anyone that is part of the WA is eligible for Delegate status. I'll add the poll for everyone to vote. Sadly, there are only 2 members currently.
|
|
|
Post by Renegade Replicant on Jun 5, 2011 23:49:48 GMT -5
Clearly, I should be the delegate so I could have double the region power.
And by the double the power, I mean redundant powers.
Completely disregard the fact I am not a member of the WA. It is irrelevant.
|
|
|
Post by The Stray Cat on Jun 6, 2011 16:21:21 GMT -5
Founder and Board Admin? I think that you have enough power. If you've not had any experience with a new Delegate, do deny him/her access to the regional controls.
|
|
|
Post by Renegade Replicant on Jun 7, 2011 13:53:13 GMT -5
I was just kidding. Hence redundant powers. I have no desire to be a delegate. I'm saving my one use for elsewhere.
I've actually already locked delegate powers in response to what happened. Obviously only temporary. Whenever everyone agrees to it, I'll gladly unlock it.
|
|
|
Post by zarog on Jun 8, 2011 0:00:01 GMT -5
We have a tie. Interesting. Well, for democratic purposes I have chosen to exclude myself from the voting process merely because with so few people in the region my own vote may not follow the wishes of the region and in small regions each vote carries greater significance. Long-winded for: I'm not voting. I believe somebody who has not yet achieved WA status should be the one to break the tie; unless there is a consensus amongst us that our region is still too small to warrant voting on a delegate.
|
|
|
Post by The Stray Cat on Jun 8, 2011 18:55:25 GMT -5
I've actually already locked delegate powers in response to what happened. Obviously only temporary. Whenever everyone agrees to it, I'll gladly unlock it. Then you'd better not CTE on us. You do and the delegate automatically gets access to the regional controls. Well, some one has to break the tie. You might as well vote for your self Zarog. I can't go WA here because I am already a delegate elsewher.
|
|
|
Post by zarog on Jun 8, 2011 21:23:53 GMT -5
Can't go back on my principles, sorry. RR I'm pretty sure hasn't voted.
|
|
|
Post by Brave One on Jun 8, 2011 21:29:19 GMT -5
It may be of interest to the voters that I am going to be gone two weeks out of the next thirty days, and in general Zarog is more active in our region. Therefore, I urge the opposing candidate to vote for themselves, and if not, some other delegate.
|
|
|
Post by The Stray Cat on Jun 9, 2011 6:40:54 GMT -5
Well the tie must be broken, for the good of the region.
|
|
|
Post by Renegade Replicant on Jun 9, 2011 18:46:21 GMT -5
I plan on unlocking it whenever someone takes over.
This is a bit of a tough spot for me as it appears its down to my vote. I have a proposition. I'll hand it to Zarog for now. Absolutely nothing personal and honestly not because of my preference. But purely because he's basically been here since day 1. Hand it to seniority. Now, we give it two weeks, grow the region, get more people in and see about running another election. Hopefully by then we could keep our votes a little more anonymous so it doesn't come down to, "well so and so needs to vote to break it" and make it come off like someone is playing favorites.
From there we can decide how often to run them.
If everyone agrees, I'll cast the vote. If anyone has a better idea, I'm absolutely open.
|
|
|
Post by zarog on Jun 9, 2011 21:17:14 GMT -5
Yes, this is a predicament. I agree that we shouldn't be trying to play favorites. I didn't mean to put you in this position RR. If Genaya agrees to your proposal, then I am okay with it. If he would prefer something else that is fine with me as well. Hopefully we can get this cleared up by tomorrow.
|
|
|
Post by Brave One on Jun 9, 2011 21:46:07 GMT -5
OUR FRIENDSHIP.
IT IS DEAD.
Of course I agree with this decision. I had already conceded to this decision. I have already endorsed Zarog. Congratulations on your delegacy!
Also, for clarification, is the founder unable to endorse members of the region? Considering Refendumssss does not seem to be active on the boards, he would not know of this election. I will send him a private message to ask him to please endorse Zarog. I know that Stray Cat cannot be a World Assembly member at this time. That does put us in a bit of trouble, because it is still very possible to be raided. Hopefully with our founder active once again, less raid groups will find interest in our nation, since we lost the 'founderless' tag. Plus, our new ability to kick and ban raiders that do choose to invade.
|
|
|
Post by zarog on Jun 9, 2011 21:53:41 GMT -5
Thanks. Lock thread.
|
|